Legal Opinion

United States v. Gomez

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1967No. 67 Cr. 296PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, District Judge.

This is a motion attacking a search and seizure of narcotics pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States Commissioner on the ground that the warrant “fails to comply with Rule 41 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure for the United States District Court.” Although the moving papers fail to specify the basis of attack, the reply affidavit of defendant’s counsel contends that the warrant was void for failure to describe with sufficient particularity the premises to be searched. The premises are described in the warrant as “130 W. 74th St., Basement Apt., New York,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. SantoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. John D. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Murrell BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Theodore Ray MelanconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. RugaberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Michael DurkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API