Legal Opinion

Meisel v. Alexander

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1955No. 1582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Ruth Alexander was a stockholder and former officer of a company dealing in television sets. She was sued by appellant Meisel on a promissory note which had been signed by her and a man named Mitchell, and which presumably covered an indebtedness of the company. Though Mitchell was first included as a defendant, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed as to him be'eause of failure of service of process, and the case proceeded against- Mrs. Alexander alone.

Her principal defenses were that she had signed the note under duress, and that the note had been discharged. Finding that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. RudbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Rizzi v. FanelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Grant v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Logan v. OliverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emmco Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API