Meisel v. Alexander
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
• CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Ruth Alexander was a stockholder and former officer of a company dealing in television sets. She was sued by appellant Meisel on a promissory note which had been signed by her and a man named Mitchell, and which presumably covered an indebtedness of the company. Though Mitchell was first included as a defendant, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed as to him be'eause of failure of service of process, and the case proceeded against- Mrs. Alexander alone.
Her principal defenses were that she had signed the note under duress, and that the note had been discharged. Finding that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. RudbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Rizzi v. FanelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Grant v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Logan v. OliverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emmco Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Morgan v. GilmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964