Legal Opinion
Fortin v. Hill & Markes, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered June 14, 2003 in Columbia County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.
In July 1995, plaintiffs and defendant Hill & Markes, Inc. (hereinafter H&M) entered into an agreement providing that H&M would purchase the assets of Shoemaker Paper Company and pay plaintiffs a royalty on its subsequent sales to an attached list of Shoemaker’s customers. H&M allegedly discovered that many of the listed customers had ceased doing business with Shoemaker prior to the asset purchase agreement and, because of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bendat v. Premier Broadcast Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Coleman, Grasso & Zasada Appraisals, Inc. v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Enrico & Sons Contracting, Inc. v. Bridgemarket AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Town of Amherst v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Swartout v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Delmar Development Partners, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Blandin v. Marathon Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- August Bohl Contracting Co. v. L.A. Swyer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Patel v. ShenoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024