Legal Opinion
Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 1, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ellerin, J.
The facts giving rise to the instant action are essentially as stated in the dissent. The automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger on October 22, 1981 was owned by the defendant Holiday Auto Lease Ltd. (Holiday), was leased to plaintiff’s employer, Major Watch Case Co. (Major) and was being operated at the time of the accident by defendant Kenneth Fuld, president of Major. (The defendant Trans Auto Systems, Inc., is a predecessor corporation of Holiday that had at some previous *431time owned the vehicle and is, therefore, not seriously involved in the action.)
F…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Botwinick v. OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Werner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Naso v. LafataNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Rauch v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- O'Connor v. MidiriaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Altman v. Kazan Import Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Koizumi v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- W & G Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- Stewart v. McNittNew York Supreme Court · 1986