Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Allen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1980No. Docket 78-1434Published

1ConcurrenceN. J. Kaufman, J.

I concur with the result. I also agree with Judge Riley’s treatment of all of the issues save one. With respect to this exception, then, I concur only in the result. I do not agree with the reasons espoused in support of this result. Specifically, second-degree murder and robbery armed convictions are not reversibly inconsistent. Instead, on the facts of this case, I find that simultaneous convictions thereon constitute a violation of defendant’s double jeopardy rights.

Had the defendant been convicted of felony murder and the underlying felony of robbery armed, it is clear that his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. WilderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. Terry AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API