Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin P. Rutherford Nanja Rutherford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 10, 2004No. 03-10158PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Martin P. and Nanja Rutherford, who were found guilty of two counts of tax evasion, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a new trial on grounds of jury intimidation, tampering, and misconduct. They assert three errors on appeal. They first contend that the district court erred in concluding that jurors’ statements that they discussed Mrs. Rutherford failure to testify at trial were inadmissible under Fed.R.Evid. 606(b). We reject this contention and affirm the district court on this point. They also assert that the jury was prejudiced because a large…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, United States of America v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, AKA Simon SimtobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Wilbourne A. Kelley III (05-1435) Barbara Kelley (05-1361)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Stouffer v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API