Legal Opinion

Cropsey v. Social Security

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 23, 2019No. 4:18-cv-02838Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK O. CROPSEY, 7 Case No. 18-cv-02838-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 10 SECURITY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Mark O. Cropsey moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of 13 the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 14 found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Title II of the 15 Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API