Legal Opinion

In Re Fierman

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1981No. 19-10331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The first issue brought before the Court is whether the petitioning general partner of the debtor should be granted relief pursuant to § 303(h) of the Code by granting of the petitioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court finds that the other general partner of the debtor failed to timely contravene the petitioner’s request for involuntary relief within the time period prescribed by Bankruptcy Rule 112. Therefore, petitioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. 1

The second issue before the Court is whether a secured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. R. Glen FENSTERMACHER, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK and Carson Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Matter of Aurora Cord and Cable Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  4. Flushing Savings Bank v. Parr (In Re Parr)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  5. Fenstermacher v. Philadelphia National Bank & Carson Investment Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaliner v. Load Rite Trailers, Inc. (In Re Sverica Acquisition Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. In Re Memphis-Friday's AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1988
  3. In Re SeychellesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  4. In Re FiermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API