Legal Opinion

Ham v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 31, 1949No. 4676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Chief Justice., Opinion.

- This suit was filed by Frances S. Weaver and sixteen others, plaintiffs below, against Roy L. Ham and Eva -Rosow and the City of San Antonio, defendants, to annul and *288cancel an ordinance passed by the San Antonio City Commission amending the original City Zoning Ordinance and changing city block A-54 at the corner of McCullough Avenue and Bushnell Avenue from a single residence A-Zone to an apartment house D-Zone. The case was tried without a jury and the court rendered judgment for plaintiffs annulling the ordinance and permanently enjoining the defendants…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of San Angelo v. Boehme BakeryTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. HamTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Davis v. NolteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API