Stephenson v. Supreme Council A. L. H.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
At Law. On motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
In many respects this controversy resembles the cases of Supreme Council, etc., v. Black, 123 Fed. 650, in the Court of Appeals for this circuit, and Daix v. Supreme Council, etc. (58, April Sessions 1903) 127 Fed. 374, which has just been decided in this district. It differs materially from both cases, however, in the nature of the defense. The present affidavit sets up the illegal by-law passed in August, 1900, that was referred to 'in those cases, reducing the amount payable upon the certificate of the plaintiff’s husband from $5,000 to $2,000, but then goes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Supreme Council A. L. H. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Daix v. Supreme Council A. L. H.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bailey v. GatesNevada Supreme Court · 1930