Legal Opinion

Mapleton Trust & Savings Bank v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1934No. 42479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

E. O. Wilson, as administrator of the estate of Joseph Wilson, filed his final report and asked for its approval and for his discharge and for the exoneration of his bond. The appellant, Mapleton Trust & Savings Bank, filed objections thereto. The objector was neither a beneficiary nor a creditor of the estate. It was a creditor and an assignee of E. O. Wilson. It set up a certain assignment made by E. O. Wilson and his wife, individually, of the one-seventh interest in the personal property of the Joseph Wil son estate, which would inure to E. O. Wilson as heir of the Joseph Wilson estate.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Lewisburg Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Wollgast v. HenningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Findley v. FindleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hanson v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Yerkes v. YerkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DuffySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Fischer v. KlinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. Cook v. Estate of ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API