Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Rubin

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

The American Jewish Congress and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People move by two separate applications “ for an order admitting [movant] as Amicus Curiae in this action to participate in the trial thereof, and all motions or other proceedings taken therein, and directing the service of copies of all papers upon the said Amicus Curiae ”,

Notice was given to the attorneys for both plaintiffs and defendant. The attorney for the defendant did not appear, and it is fair to assume that he does not object, and indeed would be willing, to have these applicants co-operate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Earn Line S. S. Co. v. Sutherland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. In Re PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. In re ColmesNew York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Baxley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Brackin v. Trimmier Law FirmSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Casey v. MaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Erie CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API