Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh Bros. Horse Co. v. Gaston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff declared, in contract, that it and Henry P. Nawn accounted together on November 1, 1918; that a balance of $3,913.08 was found due from Nawn which he agreed to pay but never paid. The defendants, in addition to general denial and payment, pleaded the statute of frauds and the statute of limitations. The case was referred to an auditor who reported findings of fact upon which, unless the statutes of frauds and of limitations constituted a defence, the defendants, as executors of Henry P. Nawn, would be liable. At the trial before a jury, the plaintiff put in the report of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyden v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Forbes v. ThorpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. O'Brien v. McSherryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Wyman v. WhicherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Exchange Realty Co. v. BinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Berwin v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Talbot v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Fisher v. GuidySupreme Court of Florida · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API