Legal Opinion
Attorney General Opinion No.
Kansas Attorney General Reports
Decided August 24, 1993Published
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Charles F. Speer, Esq. Counsel for Fairfax Drainage District 1700 City Center Square 1100 Main Street Kansas City, Missouri 64105
Dear Mr. Speer:
As counsel for the Fairfax drainage district (hereinafter district) you inquire whether the district may compel the City of Kansas City, Kansas (city) and the Kansas City board of public utilities (BPU) to pay a voluntary user fee for the use of your drainage system.
You indicate that currently all non-municipal entities which are benefited by their use of the system pay for such use through an ad valorem property tax. K.S.A. 24-407. However,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- State Highway Commission v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Bigwood v. Merrimack Village DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.