Foley v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order striking out the first and second complete defenses and the first partial defense set forth in the amended answer upon the grounds (a) that they are legally insufficient, and (b) that they are sham and frivolous.
The action is brought by plaintiff, assignee of a receiver in supplementary proceedings, to recover the cash values of twenty-four retirement annuity contracts issued to one John Y. Foley, plaintiff’s *1032husband. Plaintiff recovered a judgment against him in the sum of $16,650 for alimony arrears on December 11, 1934, in the Supreme Court, Queens county. On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Foley v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foley v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- In Re FernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2011