Rogers v. Comcast Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are two Motions filed by Boston Class Plaintiffs. The first Motion seeks to re-transfer these two consolidated cases back to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.1 The second Motion seeks leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). For the reasons that follow, both Motions are denied.
I. MOTION TO TRANSFER
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404 provides that a District Court may transfer any civil action to any other District where it might have been brought “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Qutab v. Kyäni, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- FRANCIS v. FRANCISDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.