Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Comcast Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 2014No. Civil Action Nos. 07-218, 07-219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PADOVA, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are two Motions filed by Boston Class Plaintiffs. The first Motion seeks to re-transfer these two consolidated cases back to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.1 The second Motion seeks leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). For the reasons that follow, both Motions are denied.

I. MOTION TO TRANSFER

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404 provides that a District Court may transfer any civil action to any other District where it might have been brought “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Qutab v. Kyäni, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. FRANCIS v. FRANCISDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API