Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 31, 1936No. 10764PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A policy of life insurance contained the following provisions: “If, after this policy has been in force one full year, and before default in the payment of any subsequent premium, the company receives due proof that the insured, before attaining the age of sixty years, has become wholly and permanently disabled by bodily injury or disease, so that he is and will be permanently, continuously, and wholly prevented thereby from performing any work for compensation or profit, the company will waive payment of each premium as it thereafter becomes due during the insured’s said disability. Any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Federal Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Woodall v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Saul v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API