Legal Opinion

Perrin v. Kellogg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun. Foreclosure. Defendants Kellogg, Stout, Mills and Temple appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Complainant filed his bill to foreclose several mortgages, and on the 10th day of March, 1877, a decree was rendered in his favor for the sum of $25,000, from which decree certain of the_ defendants appealed.

The appellants deny that any amount is due and owing upon these mortgages, while 'the complainant claims that the amount to which he is in fact entitled far exceeds the amount fixed by the decree, but because a greater sum could not be collected out of the property he was content with the decree as it stood.

The accounts between the principal parties interested have been running for a long…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berger v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Shane v. WINTER HILL FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Riess v. Old Kent BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Shane v. Winter Hill Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API