Seigman v. Hoffacker
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
The original writ issued in this cause is not in the record, and therefore it does not certainly appear whether this suit is in debt on the single bill set out in the narr., or in case on the promise of the defendant which is alleged. The theory of the appellant’s counsel, as disclosed by their brief, seems to be that the defendant was liable, by virtue of his endorsement, as an original promissor or-maker; whereas the brief of the appellee’s counsel treats the case as in assumpsit. For the purposes of this decision, it is immaterial which it is. The ruling of the Court below was correct,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ives v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Gist v. DrakelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
- Mitchell v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
- Shriner v. Lamborn ex rel.SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
- Baltimore Cemetery Co. v. First Independent Church of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. W. & J. Knox Net & Twine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- American Fidelity Co. v. State Ex Rel. Short & Walls Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Mattingly Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Trupp v. WolffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Lewis v. Germantown Insur. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.