Legal Opinion

Wood v. State Ex Rel. Gillespie

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1932No. 30207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

A'petition for a writ of mandamus was filed by the district attorney, attacking the validity of the congressional redistricting act of the Legislature of 1932, under House Bill No. 197. The basis of the attack is that the third and seventh congressional districts as laid out in said act do not conform to the provisions of section 3, chapter 5, Act of Congress 1911, 37 Stat. 11 (2 U. S. C. A., sec. 3), which requires or directs that the several districts shall be composed of a contiguous and compact territory and containing as nearly as practicable an equal number of inhabitants. The prayer of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Newberry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Smith v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
  4. Chatham v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Clarksdale v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API