Legal Opinion

Parham v. Standard Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided September 17, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. Action by Roy P. Parham against the Standard Oil Company of Louisiana. On demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

[1J The Workmen’s Compensation Law of the state of Louisiana (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended by Act No, 243 .of 1916 and Act No. 38 of 1918) is constitutional. Paragraph 3 c£ section 3 of this law is broad and sweeping enough in its terms to embrace a minor under the age of 18 years, and consequently the plaintiff in this case, who entered the employment of the defendant without expressly stipulating against the application of said section 3, is bound by its provisions unless he relieves himself from the presumption of section 3 as provided by paragraphs 4 and 6.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Stroube Drug Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Bourgeois v. J. W. Crawford Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API