Legal Opinion

Turpin v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In error.

1Opinion of the Court

INDICTMENT against three persons for a riot. Plea, not guilty. Verdict of guilty as to one, and of not guilty as to the others. Held, that upon this verdict, a judgment could not be rendered against the defendant found guilty. Aliter, if the indictment had been against the defendants together with others whose names were unknown. 1 Russ, on Crimes, 267. Reg. v. Soley et al. 2 Salk. 594.—Rex v. Scott et al. 3 Burr. 1262.—2 Chitt. C. L., 488 (1).

A riot is whore three or more actually do an unlawful act of violence. 3 Inst. 176. An indictment, however, against A. for that he, together with…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McQuillen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Baumer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API