Legal Opinion

Lanning v. Pepsico, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1996No. 96-502Published

1Per curiam

We find that summary judgment was prematurely entered where the scant record to date indicates the existence of a genuine issue of fact as to whether there was an agency relationship based upon the dealings between the parties. E.g., Moore v. River Ranch, Inc., 642 So.2d 642, 643 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Braidi Trading Co. v. Anthony R. Abraham Enters., Inc., 469 So.2d 955, 956-57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Further discovery, however, may conclusively resolve this issue; therefore, our reversal is without prejudice to appellees to renew their motion for summary judgment if a more developed record so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Braidi Trading Company v. Anthony R. Abraham Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Moore v. River Ranch, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API