Cohen v. Schofield
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
The four bills in this litigation are based substantially on the same grounds and have a like import and purpose: viz.: to enjoin the police authorities of the City of Philadelphia from interfering with plaintiffs in conductiong their respective manufacturing plants, praying for the return of property seized hy the police and that further seizures be restrained. The bill in each case was dismissed by the court below and these appeals followed. The four appeals will be considered and disposed of in one opinion.
Plaintiffs allege in their several bills that they are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mahoning & Shenango Railway & Light Co. v. New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Edgett v. Douglass, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1891
- Commonwealth (Ex Rel.) v. KeisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Appeal of Pittsb. & A. Drove Yard Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boggs v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- United States Nav. Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SantanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HenryPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.