FLIGHT EXP., INC. v. Robinson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
736 So.2d 796 (1999)
FLIGHT EXPRESS, INC., Appellant,
v.
Dave ROBINSON and Brinson Air, Inc., Appellees.
No. 98-2002.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 14, 1999.
Burd, Magathan, Lozano & Zacherl and William G. Burd and John S. McPhee, Miami, for appellant.
Roland Gomez, Miami Lakes and John E. Korf, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
On the main appeal, the summary judgment for the defendants Robinson and Brinson Air, Inc. is affirmed because of the manifest absence of the requisite causal relationship between the alleged breach…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. PopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Fox v. McCaw Cellular CommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. CodinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- D'ANGELO v. FitzmauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. MaterialeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Spruce Creek Dev. of Ocala v. DrewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Exp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.