Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Garber v. Savidge
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1925No. 19040. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The application for a writ of mandate asserts that the relator is a person qualified to receive a lease of state lands, and that the state is the owner and holder of the S. E. ¼ of the S. W. ¼ of seo. 36, tp. 18, N. R. 10, W. W. M., which is what is commonly known as school land; that the legislature of the state, by statute, has authorized the defendant and madé it his duty, as commissioner of public lands, to execute leases for the extraction of petroleum and natural gas from state lands; these acts appearing as Laws of 1901, ch. 106, p. 218; Rem. Comp. Stat., §§ 8028-39 [P. C. § 6496 et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- School District No. 20 v. BryanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- In re MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Ottesen v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- In re EmchWashington Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. 111.2 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OF LESS IN FERRY COUNTY, WASH.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. SavidgeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Stevens v. PaulWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1996