Boles v. BARTRUFF
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge TAUBMAN
dissenting.
Because I would conclude that plaintiff, Russel M. Boles, was denied due process at his disciplinary hearing since he was not allowed to cross-examine the complaining officer about her alleged anti-semitism, I respectfully dissent.
As the majority notes, plaintiff was found to have violated a provision of the Code of Penal Discipline (COPD) of the Department of Corrections entitled, "Abuse of Medication," a class II, Rule 14 violation. The charge was based on the alleged discovery of two prescription pills in a dental floss container on a shelf in his assigned…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.