Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boles v. BARTRUFF

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2009No. 08CA0069Published

1Dissent

Judge TAUBMAN

dissenting.

Because I would conclude that plaintiff, Russel M. Boles, was denied due process at his disciplinary hearing since he was not allowed to cross-examine the complaining officer about her alleged anti-semitism, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority notes, plaintiff was found to have violated a provision of the Code of Penal Discipline (COPD) of the Department of Corrections entitled, "Abuse of Medication," a class II, Rule 14 violation. The charge was based on the alleged discovery of two prescription pills in a dental floss container on a shelf in his assigned…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API