Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. LaQua

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1996No. Civ. No. 950406PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board found attorney John F. LaQua committed acts of professional misconduct in connection with the probate of an estate and recommended he be suspended for six months and placed on probation for an additional two months following the suspension. The Board considered the matter, accepted the findings and recommendation of the hearing panel, and under Rule 3.1(F) of the North Dakota Procedural Rules for Lawyer Disability and Discipline (NDPRLDD),1 submitted its report and recommendation of suspension for consideration by this court. LaQua filed objections to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. MaragosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. JaynesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board v. KirschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Action Against LaquaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MarshallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PelzlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API