Legal Opinion
Whitethorn v. Nash-Finch Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1940No. File No. 8310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
Plaintiff in this action seeks to recover damages from the defendants, Nash-Finch Company and Lyle E. Jensen. The defendant, Nash-Finch Company, demurred (prior to the enactment of SDC 33.0902) to the complaint, which demurrer was overruled and the Nash-Finch Company has appealed.
Plaintiff seeks to hold both defendants for damages she has allegedly suffered by reason of eating poisoned candy which she obtained from the defendant, Lyle E. Jensen. The complaint discloses that Lyle E. Jensen operates a retail store and purchased the candy in question from Nash-Finch Company. Paragraphs 5, 6, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. LyonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Norfolk Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. KrausseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Pelletier v. DupontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Wright v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Central South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- James v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Gustafson v. Gate City Co-Op CreamerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Torpey v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.