Bennett v. Hanley
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Kelators applied for mandamus to compel the set-off of an execution, etc. The facts are stated in the> opinion.
1Per curiam
George W. Williams sued the relatorsbefore a justice of the peace, and had judgment. Eelators appealed to the circuit court, Frank L. Albert-son being surety on their appeal-bond. Williams recovered judgment in the circuit February 13, 1890. Eelators came to this Court on error,, and the judgment was reversed, October 10, 1890, and costs to the amount of $47.44 were awarded them against Williams. The cause-was remanded to the circuit, and upon another trial, on-the 21st day of November, 1891, Williams again had judgment against relators, for the sum of $132.84, and also against said Albertson…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peirce v. BentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- Northam v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. West v. Florida Coast Line Canal & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Jones v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Moore v. BaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981