Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Hanley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Kelators applied for mandamus to compel the set-off of an execution, etc. The facts are stated in the> opinion.

1Per curiam

George W. Williams sued the relatorsbefore a justice of the peace, and had judgment. Eelators appealed to the circuit court, Frank L. Albert-son being surety on their appeal-bond. Williams recovered judgment in the circuit February 13, 1890. Eelators came to this Court on error,, and the judgment was reversed, October 10, 1890, and costs to the amount of $47.44 were awarded them against Williams. The cause-was remanded to the circuit, and upon another trial, on-the 21st day of November, 1891, Williams again had judgment against relators, for the sum of $132.84, and also against said Albertson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peirce v. BentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  2. Northam v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. West v. Florida Coast Line Canal & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Jones v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Moore v. BaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API