Legal Opinion
Boltz v. Eagon
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
Decided March 27, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. On motion to quash a writ of attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
TiiaybR, J.,
(orally.) In this case a writ of attachment was sued out by the plaintiff on the 13th of March of the present .year, and the writ was levied upon a slock of merchandise. On the 161h day of 3,larch, the marshal obtained an order of sale pendente lite, and the property has been advertised for sale on the 28th of this month. On the 21st of March, G. Lehman filed an intervening petition in the case, representing that on the 8th day of March II. 0. Eagon made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors to himself as assignee; that on the 9th day of March he took possession of all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pinneo v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- State ex rel. Patrick v. KeelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901