Legal Opinion

State v. Wybierala

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1975No. 45020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction for theft in violation of Minn. St. 609.52, subd. 2. We affirm.

Defendant operates two businesses at Clark and Whitall Streets in St. Paul. One, called Metro Refuse, Inc., is licensed to engage in refuse collection at 400 Whitall; the other, Poor Richard’s Inc., is, licensed to run what is termed a “junk” business or “secondhand” business at 820 Clark. There is a common entranceway at 400 Whitall. Although the businesses are owned by separate corporations, the physical layout and common dependence on defendant’s operational control…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woods & Rohde, Inc. v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Shirley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API