Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Jane Doe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 2019No. 18-1366Published

1Dissent

APPEL, Justice (dissenting).

I. Introduction.

In 2009, Jane Doe was indigent. The state charged her with two crimes. The district court appointed counsel because her income was "at or below 125% of guidelines" and she was "unable to pay an attorney." The charges were then dismissed. All that remains of the episode are a record of the dismissed charges, the burden on Doe's life created by that record, and attorney fees she owes to the state.

In the proceedings below, Doe moved to expunge the record of dismissed charges pursuant to Iowa Code section 901C.2 (2017). Recognizing that section…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API