Legal Opinion
Bley v. Ad-Art, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1967No. Civ. 747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.
This action arises as a result of a warranty contained in a written contract in which the appellant purchased from respondent all of the issued and outstanding stock of the National Neon Corporation, consisting of 15,000 shares. On January 25, 1962, when the sale was made, the corporation was engaged in the business of electrical contracting, and respondent, as its president, was actively engaged in its operation and management. Respondent was also the owner of all of the corporation’s outstanding stock.
Under the terms of the contract of sale appellant agreed to purchase the shares of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bowers v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- County of El Dorado v. Al Tahoe Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Kux v. Cal-West Lumber Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hosford v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Beaupre v. NaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- St. Julian v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969