Legal Opinion

Kilby Car & Foundry Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 3, 1923No. 7 Div. 379PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This suit is by an insurance carrier for moneys paid out for the assured.

1. The motion is overruled; the several documents exhibited in the hill of exceptions were sufficiently identified. Jones v. First Nat. Bank, 206 Ala. 203, 89 South. 437; Fuller v. Fair, 206 Ala. 654, 91 South. 591.

2. The trial of the suit of the .insurance carrier against the assured,'resulting in a judgment for defendant, was followed hy a motion for a new trial, which was granted upon the specific grounds that the trial judge had erred in refusing to give to the jury special written charges, made the basis of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Choate v. Alabama Great Southern R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Jones v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Allen v. Standard Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Thomas v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Fourth Nat. Bank v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API