Legal Opinion
People v. Kemp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion for an order directing the three complainants to submit to psychological or psychiatric examinations (see, People v Earel, 89 NY2d 960, 961). Further, “at least in the absence of any nonspeculative allegations of undue sugges*1073tion”, defendant’s motion for a pretrial hearing to determine whether the complainants had been subjected to suggestive questioning was also properly denied (People v Alvarez, 159 Misc 2d 963, 965; cf., People v Michael M., 162 Misc 2d 803, 811). The record supports the court’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Michael M.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. EarelNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. AlvarezNew York Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. NickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PulvinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.