Legal Opinion

R. B. Tippett & Bro. v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Gorter, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

The appellee sued the appellants in assumpsit on the common counts and attached to the declaration there was an account as follows:

“Baltimore, Md., July 10, 1914.
“Richard B. Tippett and James E. Tippett, co-partners trading as R. B. Tippett & Bro.,

To Olivia R. Myers, Dr.

“May 11, 1908. To Cash collected and retained...............................$800.00
“To interest on same from October 1, 1909 (the interest on said sum having been paid to that time) to date.”

The record states that annexed to the declaration was an affidavit under the Act of 1886, Chapter 184, which with amendments is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Banks v. McCosker & MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Stieff Co. v. UllrichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. Whitmam v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Rossi v. CrothersBaltimore City Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API