Legal Opinion

Belo v. Commissioners of Forsyth County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPLICATION for an Injunction heard at Fall Term, 1879, of Forsyth Superior Court, before Gilmer, J. The plaintiff’s application was granted and the defendant commissioners appealed,

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of three hundred and forty-five shares of the capital stock of the North Carolina railroad company, which have been assessed and charged with an ad valorem tax in the manner prescribed by law, and the tax list has been made out and delivered to the defendant, Hill, the sheriff of Forsyth, for collection. This suit is instituted to restrain him and the county com missioners from levying and collecting the tax, on the ground of alleged exemption under the charter of the company, and for the further reason that all proper taxes upon the taxable property of the company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Buie v. Commissioners of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. North Carolina Railroad v. Commissioners of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Richmond & Danville R. R. v. BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Person v. Board of State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Worth v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Judy v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API