Vernon v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION TO DISMISS
lx AMY, Judge.
This court, ex proprio motu, issued a rule to show cause why the above captioned appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Subsequent to this court’s rule, the two ap-pellees, Burch, Marcus, Pool, Rrupp, Daniel & Babineaux, Inc., and C-D Utility Construction Company, Inc., filed their own respective motions to have the appeal of appellant, South Central Bell Telephone Company, dismissed. For the reasons assigned below, we hereby dismiss the appeal.
A final judgment in this case was signed by the trial court on December 13, 1995. Notice of the signing of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Catalon v. Waste Management of Acadiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Madison v. Miller Brewing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roch v. Accent Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007