Hart v. National Indemnity Company
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
The crux of this appeal involves interpretation of Alaska’s Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act. 1 We affirm the superi- or court’s judgment which granted both a summary judgment and declaratory judgment in appellee National’s favor.
On September 18, 1964, appellant Peter Hart was injured when a car in which he was riding left Dowling Road, near Anchorage, and crashed. At the time of the accident the vehicle was being driven by David Harwood and was occupied by appellant Hart, Wayne Tollefsrud, and two other passengers. The automobile, which was involved in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Buzzone v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Truck Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Evron v. GiloAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.