Legal Opinion
Fell v. Northern Pac. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Dakota
Decided November 19, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions
At Law. On motion for a now trial.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of being expelled from defendant’s freight train. The action was tried by a jury, before Judge Hose, at Jamestown, in the district court in and for the sixth judicial district of the territory of Dakota, at the April term of that court, 1889. The plaintiff had a verdict for $600. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant in said territorial court, which was ponding at the time the state of North Dakota, including ail of said sixth judicial district, was admitted into the Union. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- McKinley v. C. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MyrtleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anne P. Kozar, Administratrix of the Estate of John P. Kozar, Deceased v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Kozar v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1970
- Lawrence v. Heidbreder Ice Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Voves v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Burles v. Oregon Short Line R. R.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.