Legal Opinion
United States v. F/V TAIYO MARU, NUMBER 28, SOI 600
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 17, 1975No. Civ. 74-101 SD, Cr. 74-46 SDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
These two proceedings arise from the seizure of a Japanese fishing vessel, the F/V TAIYO MARU 28, by the United States Coast Guard for violation of United States fisheries law. On September 5, 1974, the Coast Guard sighted the TAIYO MARU 28 fishing at Latitude 43-35.9 North, Longitude 69-20 West. That point is approximately 16.25 miles off the coast of the State of Maine and approximately 10.5 miles seaward from Monhegan Island. It is conceded to be within the contiguous fisheries zone of the United States. 16 U.S. C. § 1092. The Coast…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. RauscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Robert Morris Postal, Salem L. Forsythe, and George A. ChittyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- United States v. DeatonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Assertion of Jurisdiction by the United States Over Foreign Vessels Seized Pursuant to a Special Arrangement, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1980