Legal Opinion

American National Bank v. Barley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Weimer (George V.), J. Assumpsit by the American National Bank against Albert C. Barley for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The American National Bank of Nashville, Tennessee, was the owner of certain assets of the defunct Marathon Motor Works, and among them were 125 large automobile frames and 440 small ones. Defendant was engaged in manufacturing automobiles and he learned that these frames were for sale. He opened negotiations with plaintiff and finally closed a deal by wire on April 14, 1917, whereby he was to pay plaintiff $3 each for the large frames and $2 for the small ones. He paid $100 on the purchase price and agreed to pay the balance, and move the *483frames within 4 months from the date of purchase. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Cuddy v. MajorMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Henry v. HobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Solomon v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Galinski v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowman v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Performance Abatement Services, Inc. v. Lansing Board of Water & LightDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API