Crane v. State

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Upon examination of this case, as disclosed by the transcript, we find no semblance of error so far as the conviction of the defendant is concerned. Therefore the judgment of conviction of the defendant from which this appeal was taken is affirmed to that extent.

As stated, all of the proceedings in connection with the conviction of the defendant were regular and without error. But in sentencing the defendant, who failed to pay the fine and costs, or to confess judgment therefor, the trial court should have followed the provisions of Sections 338, 339 and 341, Title…