Legal Opinion

People v. Hann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (D. Goldstein, J.), imposed July 12, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced (see, People v Velez, 216 AD2d 339; People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). Upon review of the defendant’s contention, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Bailey, 215 AD2d 769; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. PrescottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API