Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phillips v. Weissert (In Re Phillips)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2010No. BAP No. 09-8032. Bankruptcy No. 07-07387. Adversary No. 07-80661Published

1Concurrence

STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge,

concurring.

I join in the Panel’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s judgment. The bankruptcy court’s findings in support of its judgment for the plaintiff were certainly not clearly erroneous.

I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority opinion’s conclusion regarding collateral estoppel. In my view, the bankruptcy court erred in granting Mrs. Phillips’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the state court judgment was preclusive as to the factual findings required for a determination of nondisehargeability.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,272 Gail Spilman v. Darryl M. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API