Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided June 16, 2016No. Docket No. 8637-13Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN FINNEGAN AND JOAN FINNEGAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Finnegan v. Comm'r

Docket No. 8637-13.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2016-118; 2016 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 117; 111 T.C.M. (CCH) 1572;

June 16, 2016, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent.

Jared J. Scharf, for petitioners.

Michael J. De Matos, Rose E. Gole, and Gennady Zilberman, for respondent.

WELLS, Judge.

WELLS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WELLS, Judge: On February 7, 2013, respondent issued petitioners a notice of deficiency determining deficiencies and section 6662(a)1 accuracy-related…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Gajewski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  4. Bolen Webb and Cornelia Webb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Robert W. Bradford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API