Brown v. Jojo-Ab, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMurphy, P.J.
I concur in the majority’s resolution of the first two issues raised by plaintiff in this appeal. However, I respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority regarding the effect of the notice provision set forth in MCL 436.22(5); MSA 18.993(5).
Our Supreme Court has held that such statutory notice provisions are not unconstitutional per se. Carver v McKernan, 390 Mich 96, 99-100; 211 NW2d 24 (1973). Nevertheless, the Court has also clearly expressed its disapproval of this type of requirement:
*213At the outset, we acknowledge frankly that statutes which limit access to the courts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carver v. McKernanMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Hobbs v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Hussey v. City of Muskegon HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Henderson v. BironMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hanger v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.