Purcell v. Alfa Mutual Ins. Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurrence
The main opinion concludes that the summary judgment is due to be affirmed based upon Purcell's alleged failure to exercise "reasonable diligence" in investigating whether he was injured by an uninsured motor vehicle. However, because the trial court expressly based its summary judgment on a different ground and did not reach the "reasonable diligence" issue, and the appellee has not asserted on appeal the "reasonable diligence" issue as a ground for affirming the trial court's judgment, I would not reach that issue on appeal. As a basic rule, on an appeal from a summary judgment, we must…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Jehle-Slauson Const. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects and Consulting EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hughes v. AllensteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Blair v. FullmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte Alabama Real Estate Appraisers BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.