Legal Opinion

Crago v. Kinzie

Harrison County Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 1, 2000No. 95-H-203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William F. Chinnock, Judge.

This opinion examines and weighs age-old fundamental rules of equity against contemporary scientific principles surrounding genetic testing to disestablish paternity.

History of the Case

This is a juvenile court action in which a putative father attempts to disestablish himself as the biological father of two children through genetic testing. He makes this attempt almost a decade after identifying himself on birth certificates as the father of the children born to the unmarried woman with whom he was living at the time of their births. This the law does not permit him…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Michael K.T. v. Tina L.T.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S.R.D. v. T.L.B.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  2. In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API